============================================================== @@@@ @@@@ @@@ @@@@ @ @ @@@@ @@@@ @@@@@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @@@@ @@@ @ @ @@@@@ @ @@@ @@@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @@@@ @ @@@ @@@@ @ @ @@@@ @@@@ @ @ @ ============================================================== Volume 9.09 May 10, 2002 -------------------------------------------------------------- Published by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) Washington, D.C. http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_9.09.html ======================================================================= Table of Contents ======================================================================= [1] DOJ Says Office of Homeland Security Not Subject to FOIA [2] EPIC Files Objections to DoubleClick Class Action Settlement [3] EPIC Urges Openness, Accountability for Infrastructure Protection [4] Consumer Groups and State AGs Argue for Financial Privacy [5] Coalition Proposes Alternatives to Weak Privacy Bill [6] EPIC Bill-Track: New Bills in Congress [7] EPIC Bookstore - The First Amendment and Civil Liability [8] Upcoming Conferences and Events ======================================================================= [1] DOJ Says Office of Homeland Security Not Subject to FOIA ======================================================================= The Department of Justice (DOJ) is seeking the dismissal of EPIC's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Office of Homeland Security (OHS). In a brief submitted to the U.S. District Court in Washington, DOJ argues that OHS is not an "agency" and therefore is not subject to the FOIA's open government requirements. The brief argues that the OHS "functions solely to advise and assist the President and, does not exercise substantial independent authority." It likens the OHS to the National Security Council, which the D.C. Circuit Court in 1996 held was exempt from the FOIA. EPIC plans to file a reply arguing that the OHS does in fact exercise substantial independent authority. The OHS has a limited track record, but has extensive powers that are already in evidence. The administration appears to prefer downplaying the role of the OHS so that there will be no "chilling effect on the advisory role" from the "knowledge that FOIA can be invoked." EPIC firmly believes that, under well-established principles of open government, an agency like the OHS -- especially with its important mandate -- should be open to public oversight. The FOIA, which, among other agencies, covers the CIA, FBI, and NSA, makes adequate provision for protecting sensitive information from disclosure. Acknowledging the proper role of the OHS will also serve to make the office more effective. EPIC is seeking the disclosure of documents relating to OHS Director Tom Ridge's efforts to create a "trusted-traveler" card and his plans to standardize state driver's licenses so as to create a de facto national identification system. For more information, see EPIC's Homeland Security Page: http://www.epic.org/open_gov/homeland/ ======================================================================= [2] EPIC Files Objections to DoubleClick Class Action Settlement ======================================================================= On Monday, May 6th, EPIC filed formal objections in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to a proposed settlement reached by class action attorneys and DoubleClick. A series of class action lawsuits were brought against DoubleClick for violation of privacy relating to the company's cookie tracking practices. These actions were consolidated by the court into a single case for settlement discussions. Because the case is a class action, the proposed settlement must be approved by the court, and a hearing has been scheduled for May 21 to determine whether the settlement is "fair, reasonable, and adequate." As part of class action procedure rules, the judge published the terms of the settlement, which will bind all individuals who were impacted by DoubleClick's profiling practices. EPIC, on behalf of itself, members of the public, and its individual employees, filed with the court formal objections to the proposed settlement and concurrently asked that its employees be exempted from the settlement if approved. EPIC asserted that the proposed settlement is inappropriate because it does not provide any significant benefit to class members that was not previously agreed to by DoubleClick as part of its earlier agreement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) under the terms of the Network Advertising Initiative (NAI). DoubleClick has not made any significant change to its practices or its policies, nor has it provided the type of meaningful privacy protection sought by the consumer and privacy organizations (including EPIC) that filed the initial complaint with the FTC. It appears that the only significant new component in the proposed settlement is DoubleClick's agreement to pay almost two million dollars to the plaintiffs' lawyers. In its submission to the court, EPIC made side-by-side comparisons between DoubleClick's obligations under the weak NAI terms and DoubleClick's obligations under the proposed settlement, and concluded that the proposed settlement fails to match those commitments to which DoubleClick is already bound. EPIC further argued that a broad range of leading organizations representing the interests of consumers across the U.S. believe that stronger obligations should be imposed on a company, such as DoubleClick, that routinely monitors and profiles Internet users without their consent. EPIC concluded its objections with specific recommendations for the provisions of a settlement agreement that serves the public interest. The proposed settlement is available at: http://www.epic.org/privacy/cookies/dblclkproposedsettlement.pdf EPIC's formal objection is available at: http://www.epic.org/privacy/cookies/doubleclickobjection.pdf For background information on the DoubleClick settlement, see: http://www.epic.org/privacy/cookies/ ======================================================================= [3] EPIC Urges Openness, Accountability for Infrastructure Protection ======================================================================= In testimony before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee on May 8, EPIC General Counsel David Sobel criticized proposals to create a new Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption for "critical infrastructure information." He told the Committee that, "rather than seeking ways to hide information, Congress should consider approaches that would make as much information as possible available to the public" concerning security flaws in critical systems. Sen. Robert Bennett (R-UT), a member of the Committee, has introduced the Critical Infrastructure Information Security Act (S. 1456), which seeks to encourage businesses to disclose to federal agencies any information they possess about vulnerabilities in computer systems or networks. The bill would grant such companies exemptions from the FOIA, as well as antitrust protections and immunity from lawsuits that might result from voluntary disclosures of security flaws. Sobel told the Committee that "Congress should consider appropriate incentives" to encourage disclosures, but "secrecy and immunity, which form the basis for many of the proposals put forward to date, remove two of the most powerful incentives -- openness and liability." He noted that "many security experts believe that disclosure and potential liability are essential components of any effort to encourage remedial action." Committee chairman Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-CT), ranking member Sen. Fred Thompson (R-TN) and several government and industry witnesses acknowledged that many issues raised by the legislation, as currently drafted, must be resolved. John Malcolm, Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Justice Department's Criminal Division, said the bill must clarify that the federal government could pursue criminal cases against companies based on information they disclose. He also expressed concern that the bill could hamper the government's ability to pursue civil cases against companies based on the voluntarily submitted information. As now written, he said, the legislation would "tie the government's hands." EPIC's testimony on critical infrastructure information: http://www.epic.org/security/infowar/sobel_testimony.html EPIC's Critical Infrastructure Protection Page: http://www.epic.org/security/infowar/resources.html ======================================================================= [4] Consumer Groups and State AGs Argue for Financial Privacy ======================================================================= EPIC, the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, U.S. PIRG and the Consumers Union submitted comments on May 1 for a U.S. Treasury Department study on the effectiveness of Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) financial privacy protections. The comments criticize the GLBA for "fail[ing] to provide the adequate protections for consumer privacy in modern financial services." The groups point to practices by some institutions -- including the sale of personal data -- and lament the loss of individual privacy due to a "lack of control over use of sensitive data." Congress enacted the GLBA, which requires companies to give notice to consumers about their information-sharing practices, in response to public concern about privacy loss. However, the GLBA places the burden on consumers to "opt-out," or affirmatively respond, if they wish to restrict how their information is shared. Because customers are unlikely to read opt-out notices, any consent implied from their silence is not truly informed. The comments describe such a system as inherently faulty: "Any system to protect the privacy of personal information that relies upon silence as agreement has the built-in elements for abuse and eventually public outcry." Other inadequacies of the GLBA highlighted in the comments are the fact that institutions have a financial incentive to create confusing privacy notices and opt-out procedures that are difficult to follow. When companies send the required notices to consumers, the notices often are overlooked or viewed as junk mail and thrown away. Second, the GLBA assumes a company has the ability or desire to explain a complex legal principle in a way that allows consumers to make an informed choice, which is not necessarily the case. Third, there are no restrictions on the sharing of information about individuals who are not customers. In addition, the enforcement mechanisms are inadequate to ensure that companies are complying with the existing protections. Attorneys General in 37 states filed similar comments on this matter, which argue that "current law does not adequately protect consumers' privacy" and poses a significant risk to consumers. EPIC's comments are available at: http://www.epic.org/privacy/financial/glb_comments.pdf Comments of 37 State Attorneys General: http://www.epic.org/privacy/financial/ag_glb_comments.html Treasury Department request for comments: http://www.epic.org/redirect/glb_study_redirect.html ======================================================================= [5] Coalition Proposes Alternatives to Weak Privacy Bill ======================================================================= Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL), Chair of the House Commerce Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection, has introduced H.R. 4678, the Consumer Privacy Protection Act of 2002. The bill, which is cosponsored by the Chair of the House Commerce Committee and 18 other Democrats and Republicans, would be the weakest federal information privacy law on the books if passed. In response, a coalition of privacy organizations has set out the framework for alternative, more effective privacy legislation. There are several inadequate provisions in Stearns' bill. For example, the bill would regulate both online and offline data collection, but individuals would have almost no protections against secondary use of their data. Individuals would receive notice and opportunity to opt-out for a five-year period, but data collectors are free to share data with an unlimited number of "information sharing partners." Additionally, individuals would have to rely on Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforcement, as the bill specifically bars private lawsuits. The bill also preempts all conflicting state privacy law, including common law and regulatory protections. This would result in a serious diminution of privacy for all Americans. Stearns' bill would harm not only American privacy, but also international privacy law and voluntary programs such as the US-EU Safe Harbor. It requires the Secretary of Commerce to "harmonize," or water down, international privacy laws so that they match the weak protections embodied in the Stearns bill. Additionally, the bill could block the FTC from enforcing voluntary agreements made under the Safe Harbor. Other provisions include a requirement that data collectors develop a security plan that is approved by company management, the ability of data collectors to renege on information sharing guarantees that exceed the notice and opt-out framework, as long as 30 days notice is given to customers, and total immunity from monetary damages if the data collector joins a self-regulatory seal program absent willful non-compliance. A coalition of privacy organizations and consumer groups sent a letter to members of Stearns' committee outlining a framework of Fair Information Practices (FIPs) for effective privacy legislation. Stearns' legislation fails to satisfy any of these FIPs. H.R. 4678, the Consumer Privacy Protection Act of 2002: http://www.epic.org/privacy/107hr4678ih.pdf The coalition privacy letter is available at: http://www.epic.org/privacy/fipsltr5.8.02.html ======================================================================= [6] EPIC Bill-Track: New Bills in Congress ======================================================================= *House* H.R.4187 Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2002. To amend chapter 22 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known as the Presidential Records Act, to establish procedures for the consideration of claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure of Presidential records. Sponsor: Rep Horn, Stephen (R-CA). Latest Major Action: 4/11/2002 referred to House committee. Latest Status: Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform. Committees: House Government Reform. H.R.4513 Social Security Number Protection Act of 2002. To strengthen the authority of the Federal Government to protect individuals from certain acts and practices in the sale and purchase of Social Security numbers and Social Security account numbers, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Markey, Edward J. (D-MA) Latest Major Action: 5/6/2002 Referred to House subcommittee. Latest Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection. Committees: House Energy and Commerce; House Ways and Means. H.R.4561 Federal Agency Protection of Privacy Act. To amend title 5, United States Code, to require that agencies, in promulgating rules, take into consideration the impact of such rules on the privacy of individuals, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Barr, Bob (R-GA). Latest Major Action: 5/1/2002 House committee/subcommittee actions. Latest Status: Subcommittee Hearings Held. Committees: House Judiciary. H.R.4598 Homeland Security Information Sharing Act. To provide for the sharing of homeland security information by Federal intelligence and law enforcement agencies with State and local entities. Sponsor: Rep Chambliss, Saxby (R-GA) Latest Major Action: 4/25/2002 Referred to House committee. Latest Status: Referred to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Committees: House Select Committee on Intelligence; House Judiciary. H.R.4628 Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003. To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2003 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Goss, Porter J.(R-FL). Latest Major Action: 5/1/2002 Referred to House committee. Latest Status: Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select). Committees: House Select Committee on Intelligence. H.R.4629 To amend the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act to establish a program to encourage and support carrying out innovative proposals to enhance homeland security, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Davis, Tom (R-VA) Latest Major Action: 5/1/2002 Referred to House committee. Latest Status: Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform. Committees: House Government Reform. H.R.4633 Driver's License Modernization Act of 2002. To amend title 23, United States Code, to establish standards for State programs for the issuance of drivers' licenses and identification cards, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Moran, James P. (D-VA). Latest Major Action: 5/1/2002 Referred to House committee. Latest Status: Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, and Science, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Committees: House Transportation and Infrastructure; House Judiciary; House Science. H.R.4640 To provide criminal penalties for providing false information in registering a domain name on the Internet. Sponsor: Rep Coble, Howard (R-NC). Latest Major Action: 5/2/2002 Referred to House committee. Latest Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. Committees: House Judiciary. H.R.4650 Aviation Biometric Badge Act. To amend title 49, United States Code, to improve airport security by using biometric security badges, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Hefley, Joel (R-CO). Latest Major Action: 5/2/2002 Referred to House committee. Latest Status: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Committees: House Transportation and Infrastructure. H.R.4678 Consumer Privacy Protection Act of 2002. To protect and enhance consumer privacy, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Stearns, Cliff (R-FL). Latest Major Action: 5/8/2002 Referred to House committee. Latest Status: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Committees: House Energy and Commerce; House International Relations. *Senate* S.2137 Family Privacy and Security Act of 2002. A bill to facilitate the protection of minors using the Internet from material that is harmful to minors, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Sen Landrieu, Mary L. (D-LA). Latest Major Action: 4/16/2002 Referred to Senate committee. Latest Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Committees: Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation. S.2201 Online Privacy Protection Act. A bill to protect the online privacy of individuals who use the Internet. Sponsor: Sen Hollings, Ernest F. (D-SC). Latest Major Action: 4/25/2002 Senate committee/ subcommittee actions. Latest Status: Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Hearings held. Committees: Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation. S.2238 Private Security Officer Employment Standards Act of 2002. A bill to permit reviews of criminal records of applicants for private security officer employment. Sponsor: Sen Levin, Carl (D-MI). Latest Major Action: 4/24/2002 Referred to Senate committee. Latest Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3307-3308) Committees: Senate Judiciary. S.2395 Anticounterfeiting Amendments of 2002. A bill to prevent and punish counterfeiting and copyright piracy, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Sen Biden Jr., Joseph R. (D-DE). Latest Major Action: 4/30/2002 Referred to Senate committee. Latest Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3562-3563) Committees: Senate Judiciary. S.2452 National Homeland Security and Combating Terrorism Act of 2002. A bill to establish the Department of National Homeland Security and the National Office for Combating Terrorism. Sponsor: Sen Lieberman, Joseph I. (D-CT). Latest Major Action: 5/2/2002 Referred to Senate committee. Latest Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3875-3880) Committees: Senate Governmental Affairs. S.2459 To provide for a terrorist identification classification system, and for other purposes. A bill to provide for a terrorist identification classification system, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Sen Wyden, Ron (D-OR). Latest Major Action: 5/6/2002 Referred to Senate committee. Latest Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Intelligence. Committees: Senate Intelligence. EPIC Bill Track: Tracking Privacy, Speech, and Cyber-Liberties Bills in the 107th Congress, is available at: http://www.epic.org/privacy/bill_track.html ======================================================================= [7] EPIC Bookstore - The First Amendment and Civil Liability ======================================================================= The First Amendment and Civil Liability, by Robert M. O'Neil. http://www.epic.org/bookstore/powells/redirect/alert909.html With increasing frequency, publishers (including owners of Web sites) are being hailed into court to answer for the content of their publications. Plaintiffs' lawyers are meeting with more success in asserting creative tort theories that, until just a few years ago, seemed unfathomable. First Amendment scholar Robert O'Neil shows how these civil liability theories are fundamentally contrary to tort theory and free speech principles. In doing so, however, O'Neil does not simply repeat First Amendment mantras; he maintains an academic perspective and sympathetic posture to plaintiffs' claims, which brings this eminently readable book even greater credibility. O'Neil focuses on certain troubling portents for continued free expression in the U.S., lending his perspective on court cases invoking civil liability for publications like Natural Born Killers, the Hit Man manual, and the Nuremberg Files Web site. O'Neil looks at seven areas where free expression is now at risk for incurring civil liability: general libel, libel on the Internet, privacy, defective or dangerous products, incitement, advertising, news-gathering, and threats/incitement on the Internet. Exploring recent cases, O'Neil looks backward for the origin of these liability theories, evaluates the reception that such theories are currently receiving, and looks ahead to hypothetical scenarios that might result in even more serious risks to free speech. Without a crystal ball, O'Neil cannot predict the future, but his analysis helps one understand the possibilities. ================================ EPIC Publications: "Privacy & Human Rights 2001: An International Survey of Privacy Laws and Developments," (EPIC 2001). Price: $20. http://www.epic.org/bookstore/phr2001/ This survey, by EPIC and Privacy International, reviews the state of privacy in over fifty countries around the world. The survey examines a wide range of privacy issues including, data protection, telephone tapping, genetic databases, ID systems and freedom of information laws. ================================ "The Privacy Law Sourcebook 2001: United States Law, International Law, and Recent Developments," Marc Rotenberg, editor (EPIC 2001). Price: $40. http://www.epic.org/bookstore/pls2001/ The "Physicians Desk Reference of the privacy world." An invaluable resource for students, attorneys, researchers and journalists who need an up-to-date collection of U.S. and International privacy law, as well as a comprehensive listing of privacy resources. ================================ "Filters and Freedom 2.0: Free Speech Perspectives on Internet Content Controls" (EPIC 2001). Price: $20. http://www.epic.org/bookstore/filters2.0/ A collection of essays, studies, and critiques of Internet content filtering. These papers are instrumental in explaining why filtering threatens free expression. ================================ "The Consumer Law Sourcebook 2000: Electronic Commerce and the Global Economy," Sarah Andrews, editor (EPIC 2000). Price: $40. http://www.epic.org/cls/ The Consumer Law Sourcebook provides a basic set of materials for consumers, policy makers, practitioners and researchers who are interested in the emerging field of electronic commerce. The focus is on framework legislation that articulates basic rights for consumers and the basic responsibilities for businesses in the online economy. ================================ "Cryptography and Liberty 2000: An International Survey of Encryption Policy," Wayne Madsen and David Banisar, authors (EPIC 2000). Price: $20. http://www.epic.org/crypto&/ EPIC's third survey of encryption policies around the world. The results indicate that the efforts to reduce export controls on strong encryption products have largely succeeded, although several governments are gaining new powers to combat the perceived threats of encryption to law enforcement. ================================ EPIC publications and other books on privacy, open government, free expression, crypto and governance can be ordered at: EPIC Bookstore http://www.epic.org/bookstore/ "EPIC Bookshelf" at Powell's Books http://www.powells.com/features/epic/epic.html ======================================================================= [8] Upcoming Conferences and Events ======================================================================= 2002 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE and the International Association for Cryptologic Research. May 12-15, 2002. Oakland, CA. For more information: http://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP02/sp02index.html O'Reilly Emerging Technology Conference. O'Reilly and Associates. May 13-16, 2002. Santa Clara, CA. For more information: http://conferences.oreilly.com/etcon/ Information Integrity World Summit. The Hands-On Summit to Protect Your Organization: Overcoming Cyber-security and E-Privacy Threats. Information Integrity. May 15-16, 2002. Washington, DC. For more information: http://www.411integrity.com/live/80/events/80II102 Personal Privacy in the Digital Age: The Challenge for State and Local Governments. Joint Center for eGovernance. May 19-21, 2002. Arlington, VA. For more information: http://www.conted.vt.edu/privacy/agenda.htm Call For Papers - June 1, 2002 (special recognition for outstanding student papers). 18th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC): Practical Solutions to Real Security Problems. Applied Computer Security Associates. December 9-13, 2002. Las Vegas, Nevada. For more information: http://www.acsac.org/ Third Annual Institute on Privacy Law. Practising Law Institute. June 3-4, 2002, San Francisco, CA; June 24-25, New York, NY. For more information: http://www.pli.edu/ Big Brother Is Watching: The Independent Policy Forum. The Independent Institute. June 6, 2002. Oakland, CA. For more information: http://www.independent.org/tii/forums/020606ipf.html Privacy Paradox: The Gain of Security vs. Privacy's Loss. Strategic Research Institute. June 17-18, 2002. Chicago, IL. For more information: http://www.srinstitute.com/ci234/ INET 2002. Internet Crossroads: Where Technology and Policy Intersect. Internet Society. June 18-21, 2002. Washington, DC. For more information: http://www.inet2002.org/ The Public Voice in Internet Policy Making. June 22, 2002. Washington, DC. The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) will host a one-day public symposium to discuss the future of our rights and freedoms in the information age. The event is being hosted in conjunction with INET 2002 and is free and open to the public. For more information: http://www.thepublicvoice.org/events/dc02/ IViR International Copyright Law Summer Course. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. July 8-12, 2002. Amsterdam, Netherlands. For more information: http://www.ivir.nl/ O'Reilly Open Source Convention. O'Reilly and Associates. July 22-26, 2002. San Diego, CA. For more information: http://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/ Cyberwar, Netwar and the Revolution in Military Affairs: Real Threats and Virtual Myths. International School on Disarmament and Research on Conflicts (ISODARCO). August 3-13, 2002. Trento, Italy. For more information: http://www.isodarco.it/html/trento02.html ILPF Conference 2002: Security v. Privacy. Internet Law & Policy Forum. September 17-19, 2002. Seattle, WA. For more information: http://www.ilpf.org/conference2002/ Privacy2002. Technology Policy Group. September 24-26, 2002. Cleveland, OH. For more information: http://www.privacy2000.org/privacy02/index.shtml ======================================================================= Subscription Information ======================================================================= Subscribe/unsubscribe via Web interface: http://mailman.epic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/epic_news Subscribe/unsubscribe via email: To: epic_news-request@mailman.epic.org Subject line: "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" (no quotes) Help with subscribing/unsubscribing: To: epic_news-request@mailman.epic.org Subject: "help" (no quotes) Back issues are available at: http://www.epic.org/alert/ The EPIC Alert displays best in a fixed-width font, such as Courier. ======================================================================= Privacy Policy ======================================================================= The EPIC Alert mailing list is used only to mail the EPIC Alert and to send notices about EPIC activities. We do not sell, rent or share our mailing list. We also intend to challenge any subpoena or other legal process seeking access to our mailing list. We do not enhance (link to other databases) our mailing list or require your actual name. In the event you wish to subscribe or unsubscribe your email address from this list, please follow the above instructions under "subscription information". Please contact info@epic.org if you would like to change your subscription email address, if you are experiencing subscription/unsubscription problems, or if you have any other questions. ======================================================================= About EPIC ======================================================================= The Electronic Privacy Information Center is a public interest research center in Washington, DC. It was established in 1994 to focus public attention on emerging privacy issues such as the Clipper Chip, the Digital Telephony proposal, national ID cards, medical record privacy, and the collection and sale of personal information. EPIC publishes the EPIC Alert, pursues Freedom of Information Act litigation, and conducts policy research. For more information, e-mail info@epic.org, http://www.epic.org or write EPIC, 1718 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20009. +1 202 483 1140 (tel), +1 202 483 1248 (fax). If you'd like to support the work of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, contributions are welcome and fully tax-deductible. Checks should be made out to "EPIC" and sent to 1718 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20009. Or you can contribute online at: http://www.epic.org/donate/ ======================================================================= Drink coffee, support civil liberties, get a tax deduction, and learn Latin at the same time! Receive a free epic.org "sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" coffee mug with donation of $75 or more. ======================================================================= Your contributions will help support Freedom of Information Act and First Amendment litigation, strong and effective advocacy for the right of privacy and efforts to oppose government regulation of encryption and expanding wiretapping powers. Thank you for your support. ---------------------- END EPIC Alert 9.09 ----------------------- .